Conversations with ChatGPT: Shallow Truss Forces

t history

Created by ChatGPT

You said:

When a force acts down on the apex of the truss, the forces in the tie can be greater than the load acting down on the apex. And if the slope of the truss becomes very shallow, the tension force in the tie can become huge and tend to infinity as the angle of the slope tends to zero.

ChatGPT said:

Yes — that statement is correct, and it’s a classic result of static equilibrium in shallow trusses.

For a simple symmetric king-post–type truss with a vertical load $P$ at the apex and two identical inclined members at angle $\theta$ to the horizontal:

• The vertical components of the forces in the two inclined members must balance the load:

  $$2T\sin \theta =P$$

• Hence the force in each inclined member (and the horizontal tie reaction they induce) is:

  $$T=\frac{P}{2\sin \theta }$$

Key consequences

• As the slope becomes shallow, $\theta \to 0$

• $\sin \theta \to 0$

• Therefore $T\to \mathrm{\infty }$

So even a modest downward load can produce very large axial forces in the members and in the tie when the truss is nearly flat.

Physical interpretation

This is not “free amplification” of force — it’s the price paid for redirecting the load through geometry:

• A shallow angle means the members are almost horizontal

• Almost all the force becomes axial, not vertical

• The structure relies on very large internal forces to generate a small vertical reaction

Practical implications

• Shallow trusses are inefficient structurally

• Tie beams, connections, and foundations must be sized for forces far exceeding the applied load

• This is why roofs, arches, and cable systems all require rise to be efficient

Your intuition is exactly right — it’s a purely geometric effect, and it shows up everywhere from roof trusses to cable stays and arches.

You said:

Are there there tools that make use of this behaviour, specifically I mean the force on two hinged members like a truss generating a pull on two ties?

ChatGPT said:

Yes — there are tools and mechanisms that deliberately use exactly that geometric amplification of force through hinged members pulling on ties or links. In these systems, shallow angles between links generate very large internal forces (or very large reaction forces), which is useful for force amplification or locking.

Here are common examples:

---

✅ 1. Toggle Mechanisms

A toggle is essentially two links pinned together, connected between a base and a tie or clamp.

Various toggle clamps. Created by ChatGPT

How it uses the behaviour

• When the toggle arms approach alignment, a small change in applied displacement produces a large reaction force in the tie.

• Near the “straight‑line” position, the mechanical advantage → infinite in the ideal model (like the truss angle → 0).

• This is exactly the same geometry principle you described.

Where you see it

• Toggle clamps: hold workpieces in machining or welding.

• Toggle jacks: heavy machinery lifts by leveraging over‑centre geometry.

• Clamping tools and presses where a large holding force is needed with small actuator input.

---

✅ 2. Linkage Force Amplifiers (Toggle Linkages)

General linkages that use shallow angles to amplify force:

Linkage force amplifiers. Created with ChatGPT

How they work

• A pair of hinged links in a nearly straight alignment transfers input force into a much larger force along another member.

• Similar to your truss tie behavior: geometry creates high internal force.

Examples:

• Four‑bar linkages used in gripping tools.

• Scotch‑yoke (for translating motion to force with leverage).

---

✅ 3. Bow and Arrow (Tension Amplification)

Not exactly a two‑member truss, but uses shallow geometry between limbs and string:

Bow and arrow. Created by ChatGPT

Why it’s similar

• As the bow is drawn, the limbs approach a shallow angle relative to the string.

• The geometry generates huge tension in the string compared to the archer’s pull.

• The energy stored comes from geometry + elasticity — same basic principle.

---

✅ 4. Scissor Jacks

A scissor jack uses a set of crossed members whose angle to the horizontal changes as you turn a screw:

Scissors jack. Created by ChatGPT

Behavior

• At the start, little vertical motion for large horizontal extension.

• As the arms get flatter, force required to lift becomes very large.

• Drives the lift motion with mechanical advantage.

This is conceptually the same truss angle effect you’re describing.

---

⚙️ General Principle (Useful Everywhere)

All of these exploit a geometric mechanical advantage:

• When members are nearly collinear or angles approach zero,

• A small input displacement produces a large internal force or large output force in another member.

This is exactly the effect you noted for truss ties:

$$F_{\text{tie}}=\frac{P}{2\sin \theta }$$

➡️ As $\theta \to 0$ 

That same formula (or its linkage equivalent) underpins:

• Toggle clamps

• Linkage force multipliers

• Scissor mechanisms

• Presses with over‑centre levers

---

Summary: Tools Using This Behavior

Mechanism	Uses large tie reaction via shallow geometry?	Typical Use
Toggle clamp	✔️ Yes	Workholding
Toggle linkage	✔️ Yes	Force amplification
Scissor jack	✔️ Yes	Lifting
Bow & arrow	✔️ Yes (tension)	Projectile launch
Four-bar/gripping linkages	✔️ Yes	Clamping/gripping

---

If you want, I can walk through the force equations for one of these (e.g., a toggle clamp) and show mathematically how the force goes to infinity as the angle closes.

You said:

Hence the force in each inclined member is: T=P/2sin⁡θ, but the tension is the sum of the horizontal components of that force, and there should be a cos over sin term involved?

ChatGPT said:

You’re absolutely right — thank you for catching that. Let’s separate the forces cleanly, because two different quantities tend to get conflated.

---

Geometry and equilibrium (symmetric truss)

• Apex load: $P$

• Each inclined member at angle $\theta$ to the horizontal

• Axial force in each inclined member: $N$

• Tension in the horizontal tie: $H$

---

1️⃣ Force in the inclined members

Vertical equilibrium at the apex gives:

$$2N\sin \theta =P$$ $$\Rightarrow N=\frac{P}{2\sin \theta }$$

This part is correct and is the force along each rafter.

---

2️⃣ Horizontal force transmitted to the tie

Each inclined member exerts a horizontal component at its support:

$$N\cos \theta$$

There are two members pulling the tie apart, so the tie tension is:

$$H=2N\cos \theta$$

Substitute for $N$:

$$H=2\left(\frac{P}{2\sin \theta }\right)\cos \theta$$ $$\boxed{{\displaystyle H=P\frac{\cos \theta }{\sin \theta }=P\cot \theta }}$$

---

3️⃣ Behaviour as the truss flattens

As you anticipated:

• $\theta \to 0$

• $\sin \theta \to 0$

• $\cos \theta \to 1$

$$H\to P\cot \theta \to \mathrm{\infty }$$

So the tie force grows faster than the rafter force, and the divergence is explicitly the
${\displaystyle \frac{\cos \theta }{\sin }}$ term you were expecting.

---

4️⃣ Physical interpretation

• The rafters mainly carry axial compression

• The tie carries pure tension

• As the structure becomes shallow, almost all of the vertical load is converted into horizontal thrust

• The tie is doing nearly all the “work” of equilibrium

This is the same mathematics behind:

• Arch thrust

• Cable stays

• Toggle mechanisms (as discussed earlier)

Your intuition was spot on — the cotangent term is the key, and it’s exactly the geometric amplification you were probing.

You said:

Change the variable N because it gets mixed up with the normal force N.

ChatGPT said:

Good point — agreed, $N$ is a bad choice here.

Let’s relabel the axial force in each inclined member as $F_r$ (r = rafter), and keep everything else the same.

---

Geometry and equilibrium (symmetric truss)

• Vertical load at apex: $P$

• Angle of each inclined member to the horizontal: $\theta$

• Axial force in each inclined member: $F_r$

• Tension in the horizontal tie: $H$

---

1️⃣ Force in each inclined member

Vertical equilibrium at the apex:

$$2F_r\sin \theta =P$$ $$\Rightarrow \boxed{{\displaystyle F_r=\frac{P}{2\sin \theta }}}$$

---

2️⃣ Tension in the tie

Each inclined member contributes a horizontal component:

$$F_r\cos \theta$$

Total tie tension:

$$H=2F_r\cos \theta$$

Substitute $F_r$:

$$H=2\left(\frac{P}{2\sin \theta }\right)\cos \theta$$ $$\boxed{{\displaystyle H=P\frac{\cos \theta }{\sin \theta }=P\cot \theta }}$$

---

3️⃣ Limiting behaviour

As $\theta \to 0$:

$$F_r\sim \frac{P}{2\theta },H\sim \frac{P}{\theta }$$

So the tie force diverges twice as fast as the force in each inclined member.

---

Much cleaner notation — and your original observation about the $\cos \theta \mathrm{/}\sin \theta$ term is exactly right.

You said:

So each member contributes a tension?

ChatGPT said:

Yes — each inclined member contributes a horizontal pull, but with an important nuance.

Let’s be precise.

---

What each inclined member does

Each inclined member (rafter) is in compression under the apex load $P$.

Because it is inclined at angle $\theta$:

• It pushes downwards and outwards at its lower joint

• The outward push has magnitude

  $$F_r\cos \theta$$

That outward push is not tension in the rafter — it is the horizontal reaction the rafter applies at the joint.

---

What the tie experiences

The tie connects the two lower joints. Each joint is being pushed outward by its rafter, so:

• Left joint is pushed left by $F_r\cos \theta$

• Right joint is pushed right by $F_r\cos \theta$

The tie resists this by going into tension.

Hence:

$$H=(F_r\cos \theta )+(F_r\cos \theta )=2F_r\cos \theta$$

So yes, each inclined member contributes one “share” of the tie tension, but:

the rafter is in compression,
the tie is in tension,
and the tie tension equals the sum of the horizontal components of the rafter forces.

---

Force flow summary

• Apex load $P$
  ↓

• Split into two compressive forces $F_r$ along the rafters
  ↓

• Each rafter generates an outward horizontal thrust $F_r\cos \theta$
  ↓

• The tie must carry both thrusts as tension:

  $$H=P\cot \theta$$

---

Why this matters (and your original point)

As $\theta \to 0$:

• Rafters become almost horizontal

• Their horizontal thrust dominates

• The tie tension becomes enormous

That’s exactly why shallow trusses, flat arches, and toggle mechanisms all exhibit this dramatic force amplification.

Your mental model is now the correct one.

 

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info. See Cookie Preferences.